A Review of Personal logo by Jami Gibbs

Nothing

  • Jami Gibbs

    Jami Gibbs

    Rank: 1 Elite

    1780

    • Design: 5
    • Purpose: 4
    • Originality: 4
    • Engagement: 4
    1 Vote
    Nothing

    Posted on Jul 02, 2010 at 1:35 AM

    I wouldn't change a thing on any of these choices and whoever said that the fonts are weak are totally wrong. Please don't change the fonts! They're elegant and classy and especially work well for a web designer's portfolio.

    Personally, I find concept 2 more engaging mostly because of the more prominent green and because I don't have to struggle to read "vitart". I'm leaning towards Concept 2A because it also includes "design" which I think is important to include. If you're using your logo outside of your website, people will appreciate knowing right away that the logo is for a design studio or something instead of having to guess what "vitart" is.

    • Vita Levchenko
      Vita Levchenko commented:
      Posted: on Jul 02, 2010 at 10:07 PM

      Thank you Jami. I am struggling to choose between readability and design which appeals to me more.

      Report Abuse
    • Yuriy Zaremba
      Yuriy Zaremba commented:
      Posted: on Jul 07, 2010 at 10:09 PM

      I agree with this. I like how the first 2 look more, but It's hard to make out Vitart. Either way, I like to look and typography.

      Report Abuse
    Comment Report Abuse