• Michael Minter

    Michael Minter

    Rank: 3 Superior

    900

    • Design: 5
    • Purpose: 4
    • Originality: 3
    • Engagement: 4
    0 Votes
    #9

    Posted on Jan 11, 2010 at 2:30 PM

    Is the most attractive

    • M. H.
      M. H. commented:
      Posted: on Jan 12, 2010 at 3:54 AM

      Hi Michael, I added another version of #9. What do you think?

    • Michael Minter
      Michael Minter commented:
      Posted: on Jan 12, 2010 at 2:40 PM

      You should have made a new concept page just for #16

    • M. H.
      M. H. commented:
      Posted: on Jan 12, 2010 at 4:06 PM

      Hi Michael, yes perhaps. But I didn`t want to pollute the frontpage with 3 concepts in a row ;-) I think when time is come I will post the finalist logos in a new concept. But anyway, what do you think about #16?

    • Michael Minter
      Michael Minter commented:
      Posted: on Jan 12, 2010 at 4:16 PM

      Well if this is some site that uses javascript to actually "drag" items over and around a page than #16 is the best design to use.

      With the "g" hovering over the rest of the title and the movement cursor as part of that element, it really initiates the idea of full on "dragging".

      I'd definitely bump up the review scores for #16

    • M. H.
      M. H. commented:
      Posted: on Jan 12, 2010 at 4:21 PM

      yes, it will be js-powered. yes, the main purpose is to drag and rearrange elements. And yes, I like your comment ;-)

      What do you think? Should I start a new concept with only this logo or with the 3 "finalists" #5, #13/14, #16?

    • Michael Minter
      Michael Minter commented:
      Posted: on Jan 12, 2010 at 5:42 PM

      It would be a great idea to start a new critique board for sample #16.

      If you still want more criticism on other safe bets, than you could sample #5 and #9, as well.