Richard BanfieldPremium Concept

Home Page for Makeover Machine website

By Richard Banfield

   on Aug 13, 2010
7 Reviews5 Votes0 Favorites1134 Views

Concept Reviews

  • Emma Simpson

    Emma Simpson

    Rank: 1 Elite

    CF Verified professional

    10036

    • Design: 4
    • Purpose: 4
    • Originality: 4
    • Engagement: 4
    2 Votes
    This review has been awarded.
    More information about who is behind it all

    Posted on Aug 13, 2010 at 3:17 PM

    Overall this site looks great. It's fun, is engaging, has personality and the illustration works really well.


    • It would be nice if there was an 'about' section. I want to know more about why a company would want to spend so many hours a week doing redesigns for people for fun/free. Also is the coding included or are photoshop psd documents supplied or just jpegs? An FAQ would be helpful too.

    • As far as the design goes the logo is too similar in size to me to the sell in the top right corner. My eye isn't naturally drawn through the site and these two top elements need their hierarchy sorted out. One should be more prominent than the other.

    • Next the spacing on the element on the left feels a little off. The 'Why should I try it' line is as close to the logo above as the copy below but then there is a horizontal rule between 'plus... it's FREE Try it now.' I would move the sub head 'Why should I try it?' a little lower down and put the copy it's relating to slightly closer to it. Then either separate out the plus... it's FREE line either further away or so that it lives with the copy above better.

    • The colours are great and the before & after makeovers are great although very large but at least this way you get to see them properly. Maybe though look at making them smaller and possible to click through if people want to see them bigger. That way you could have a footer which isn't quite so far down the bottom of the page and use that for FAQs, abouts and some links to maybe your professional paid for work.

    • Dave Wood
      Dave Wood commented:
      Posted: on Aug 13, 2010 at 5:13 PM

      I reckon they knock up a jpeg mock-up for free then the companies go 'oh wow that looks so much better than our current site!' and then pay them lots of money to code the site... ! Quite clever really.

    • Richard Banfield
      Richard Banfield commented:
      Posted: on Aug 15, 2010 at 7:15 PM

      Thanks Emma. Great feedback. We've go a few improvements on the before and after screenshots that I think you'll approve of.

  • Aurimas Adomavicius

    Aurimas Adomavicius

    Rank: 1 Elite

    CF Verified professional

    4702

    • Design: 4
    • Purpose: 5
    • Originality: 5
    • Engagement: 4
    1 Vote
    This review has been awarded.
    Spacing around left column

    Posted on Aug 13, 2010 at 5:22 PM

    Honestly I'm having a hard time picking just the right stuff to nitpick on because I really like the layout and the idea. Everything is well placed, the graphic is neat (which made me chuckle... because our own website uses a similar illustration, but a little less colorful: link text

    My main "beef" is with two areas of the site. The first is the left column. Wile you have substantial white space on the right side of the page, the left column seems a bit cramped. The button (submit my site) is harder to read and due to it's size is hard to "pin" as a button. We expect buttons to be of certain size - you should cater to those expectations. The bullet points and spacing around that list also could use some work.

    The second part is the bottom before and afters. I would suggest removing the names of the companies and making the screens of even size. I would also suggest making the "banners" across the top right corner to be of the same color for all before's and all after's.

    Add lightbox functionality to allow the user to expand the screen capture. A really light, slight drop shadow border around each capture would give it depth and dimension.

    Other than that I don't have anything - you're on the right path.

    • Emma Simpson
      Emma Simpson commented:
      Posted: on Aug 14, 2010 at 7:54 PM

      The illustration on your site is great. I like the idea of being able to lure clients into a lair and then strapping them into a big machine to scan their brains. Lots of fun.

    • Richard Banfield
      Richard Banfield commented:
      Posted: on Aug 15, 2010 at 7:17 PM

      Good comments Aurimas. I like the expanding screenshot idea. Makes me think we should laso do an auto screenshot function like Concept Feedback does when you enter a URL of the site you want reviewed.

  • Mark Ong

    Mark Ong

    Rank: 2 Titan

    702

    • Design: 5
    • Purpose: 4
    • Originality: 4
    • Engagement: 4
    1 Vote
    This review has been awarded.
    Before & After Portion

    Posted on Aug 13, 2010 at 10:11 PM

    Firstly, this is an excellent design concept. The illustration s brilliant and very original!

    My biggest gripe is that it looks more like a poster/flyer than a website. Reason being the lack of an apparent form of site navigation (i understand the main call-to-action is to submit and/or signup) and a strong footer to complement.

    What I'd really love to do is not layout so many screenshots at a go. Perhaps some form of carousel would keep it a little cleaner, focused and more "interactive" (allowing the user to cycle through the various screens).

    To take the concept one step further and keeping with the fun and simple branding that you've set out to achieve, you could introduce something playful as indicators for the "Before" and "After" instead of the diagonal ribbon on the top right. Perhaps a little "Duh!" vs "Wow!" kind of smilie.

    More details in the notes.

    Notes Added to Images   View

    • www.makeovermachine.com
      • 1Header

        Push the main tagline down below the header to cater for a possible navigation, and to clearly define the header of the website.

      • 2Call to Action Panel

        I'd push this down below the bullet points as a horizontal row

      • 3Smaller Graphic

        Could make the graphic a little smaller so that it lines up with the left set of bullet points. Your main tagline would site above this, likely horizontally and center aligned.

    Notes Added to Images   View

    • Super Web-O-Matic Makeover Machine_1281725050659.png
      • 1Divider

        Create some sort of clear definition between the main banner graphic, and the portfolio section. Currently, this part looks like a simple H2 following some intro content.

      • 2Client Name

        The heading for the client name is a little strange as it doesn't cut across both screenshots. Consider extending it all the way to the right, or lose the background color and have a simple border-bottom.

      • 3More Footer

        I hope that's not the end of the footer. The top area seems to have so much effort put into it, but the footer seems like a disappointing afterthought. Even if you intend not to have a top navigation, do keep a good footer with the necessary legal info and links, about and contact information. The footer should be light text on a dark background (not unlike the CF site) for a clear definition as well.

    • Richard Banfield
      Richard Banfield commented:
      Posted: on Aug 15, 2010 at 7:18 PM

      Mark, awesome details. We are adding a new footer this week. I'll keep everyone posted.

  • Nick Shippers

    Nick Shippers

    Rank: 4 Master

    209

    • Design: 4
    • Purpose: 2
    • Originality: 5
    • Engagement: 2
    1 Vote
    This review has been awarded.
    JQuery

    Posted on Aug 19, 2010 at 7:59 PM

    There's lots of design, but not a lot of development.

    Love the graphic and I can see that the designer must be really good at illustrator and photoshop and can simply mock up a site in those programs. I just hope that you are not slicing up .psd or .ai files. This wont be good for clients that want a lot of changes, but great for someone that just wants a static site.

    Ok, I got my two cents out of the way. About this site specifically...

    1. Definitely needs a better footer. It looks like you put a lot of work into the Makeover Machine, but got lazy when it came to the footer
    2. No menu navigation. The concept is nice, but no way to find out what the catch is. No section to describe the "CEO" and their education, history, etc. If I were a client, and not a winner of your contest, I would wonder what costs are to maintain the site, etc.
    3. Jquery! This site could be really awesome with some nice jquery sliders, but I can see that the designer's talent is not in programming, but in graphic design. You should check out some jquery articles on smashingmagazine.com or Web Designer Magazine's recent JQuery issue.
    4. When I looked up the sites you display, they are not redesigned like you show. That leads me to wonder who has actually taken you up on your makeover machine content (which btw, has no deadline?)
    5. Basically, I like the direction you are heading in, I like how you are inspiring a "wow, i wanna submit my site" mentality, but I have serious issues with describing your business model on your site.
    • Richard Banfield
      Richard Banfield commented:
      Posted: on Aug 20, 2010 at 2:14 PM

      Hi Nick, this is very useful and actionable feedback. The site launch has been a huge success so we're definitely going to give it tons of attention this week and make the changes you and the other reviewers have recommended.

  • Rebecca Perry

    Rebecca Perry

    Rank: 1 Elite

    11008

    • Design: 4
    • Purpose: 4
    • Originality: 4
    • Engagement: 4
    1 Vote
    This review has been awarded.
    add navigation

    Posted on Aug 19, 2010 at 9:42 PM

    Hello - I'll start by saying that I love the design concept. The 50's theme definitely works, and the main image is right on point. Overall aesthetically pleasing, however what bothers me is the following:

    • where's the main navigation? (about us, contact, gallery, client testimonials, etc...)
    • Where is the privacy policy?
    • Terms and Conditions?
    • what is the selection criteria?
    • if selected, what does that specifically entail?
    • sign up link for makeover event is expired. (either remove it completely upon expiration or display next available event details)
    • when i went to the Super Web-O-Matic site, a few of the client gallery examples had bogus footer information which puts up red flags for me.
    • if I submit a site and am not "selected" for a revamp, am I notified?

    You're requiring users to submit their name, company name, email, phone number, site url, and reason for submission, yet disclose nothing as to what they will get in return.

    • Richard Banfield
      Richard Banfield commented:
      Posted: on Aug 20, 2010 at 2:12 PM

      Thanks very much Rebecca, we're working on adding the footer and additional nav items you mentioned. The first version of the site was really just to test the idea. Now that we have received dozens of submissions we can start to take it seriously and get the detailed elements in place.

    • Rebecca Perry
      Rebecca Perry commented:
      Posted: on Aug 20, 2010 at 3:36 PM

      excellent...I look forward to seeing future revisions. Good Luck :-)

  • Lihi Lothan

    Lihi Lothan

    Rank: 3 Superior

    71

    • Design: 5
    • Purpose: 5
    • Originality: 5
    • Engagement: 3
    0 Votes
    Icrease Conversion

    Posted on Nov 07, 2010 at 11:17 AM

    I'll add my 2 cents - agree with the other reviews, loving the design and illustration and focusing on adding the navigation and making this more a site than a flyer, but i think there are some more things to add, to increase conversion:

    1. Instead of "plus... it's Free..." and a separate Submit My Site, create a button saying - SUBMIT MY SITE as top sentence, and It's Free! as the sentence below

    2. If there's a sign up/ creating an account, it should be on the first page. If i have submitted my site, i'm not sure i want to see this page everytime and scroll down to see if it's featured, so you could use cookies to re-direct users to another page (or have this top section as an expand/ collapse panel)

    3. i think that since the elements are round (the logo, points), the buttons should have round corners as well

  • Ravi Kumar V.

    Ravi Kumar V.

    Rank: 10 Newbie

    43

    • Design: 3
    • Purpose: 3
    • Originality: 3
    • Engagement: 2
    0 Votes
    Nice try

    Posted on Aug 14, 2010 at 5:03 AM

    actually it not looks like normal other websites. This is a site with new theme. Good

    • Aaran Casey
      Aaran Casey commented:
      Posted: on Aug 15, 2010 at 4:09 PM

      Yet again, a totally useless review... I wish there was still the down vote option!

    • Richard Banfield
      Richard Banfield commented:
      Posted: on Aug 15, 2010 at 4:18 PM

      Agreed. This comment was not in depth enough to warrant being posted.

    • Tom Charde
      Tom Charde commented:
      Posted: on Aug 19, 2010 at 9:14 PM

      Richard is being nice; this post has little coherence, let alone depth. Looks like someone put words in a blender, hit "Puree" and then posted it as a review. Fail.

    • Ravi Kumar V.
      Ravi Kumar V. commented:
      Posted: on Aug 20, 2010 at 1:40 PM

      oh Dear God, all I said was is "This website looks really very good, with good color theme and image selection like not others do" which means this site builted wihtout normal sections like header, body part and footer. which meant I was really amazed by this site. By in hurry and lake of my english fluency you mistaken me. (FYI: English is not my mother tongue)

    • Aaran Casey
      Aaran Casey commented:
      Posted: on Aug 21, 2010 at 2:10 AM

      Ok Ravi, I get that it's not your mother tongue, but when you post a review it helps to be more in depth, and with a heading like "nice try" and a score of all 3's & 2's it looks like you are posting reviews so that you can get your quota... We designer's, developer's and marketer's post our work on here to get feedback... what you posted was poor.