Hi Michael,
I must say I always comment on usability but with you I don't need to :) Everything is where it suppose to be, look is clean, nothing fancy but it's a club site for insiders only. All they need is info.
The only thing I would change is photos. It would be so much better if there was one big photo of people riding/swimming/running. Otherwise it looks to me like a Club For People Who Like To Stand Together And Look Into Camera :D
Cheers!
Michael
Overall, I really like the design. It looks modern, clean and balanced. I only gave it a 2.5 for originality, but that's actually ok for the purpose of this website.
There are only two things I would change:
One thing that I'm also missing here (but that could be on purpose) is a link to a Facebook group, a Twitter account or something similar. But maybe you have something better in the members section?
Nice work so far. I think the general layout is good and almost everything is in alignment. Here are a few suggestions for improvement:
Hi Andy
Thanks for your feedback. That's a lot and I'll try to change those things in the next round. Concerning your comment
-Michael
Hey Michael - In regards to the caption under the photo, I was trying to say that the main image has text over the photo and a caption under it - it's too much text. I'd recommend sticking to the caption only and remove the text. Then, do the same for the 2 smaller images (remove the text from over the photo and include a small gray box under each with the caption). Hope that helps.
Ah, now I understand. I was playing around with that white text for quite some time and honestly, the readability isn't that high. Thanks for clarification. -Michael
Excellent, but it could be a little more creative.
Hi Michael
Thanks for your feedback. There are a lot of constraints on this project, time, the current print styles, and the current state. In addition, forum, download section and event calendar are more important and therefore I'll take more time.
You're right with the photos, there should be some more action. Although the current ones are for illustration purpose only, I wouldn't have thought about your comment.
Thanks again Michael