A New Version of the Concept has been posted. View New Version
This concept is a new version of an older concept. View Old Version
9 Reviews2 Votes0 Favorites280 Views
Concept Description
- Objective:
- Logo for online survey panel
- Categories:
- logo
I trying to develop a logo for an online survey panel site. (the brand and site will follow)
Its basically a site where people register to do surveys for independent market research. The can share their opinions. blog, and eventually manage their rewards for taking polls/surveys.
We are aiming for three demographics: business professionals, pharma/medical professionals, and consumers.
they want it to be clean and "trendy" but professional.
I have three different concepts below. Which should I focus on?
Please comment and pick characteristics from any one of them to critique.
Previous Versions
Version 3
Version 2
Version 1
Concept has received the needed feedback and has been closed by the user.
Concept Reviews
-
The second concept is the best but is still too busy. Too many colors and objects. You need to simplify these concepts.
-
I think it give the meaning of the survey with it's variety bubbles...
but I think that you should work on the gradient a little bit, try giving it web2 effect something like this ..
Good job.
-
First is good, but without people silhouettes. I really liked the second one, but I'm not sure about three color palette and balloons. Maybe try to incorporate them in O's like you did in #7.
-
I like #1 the best because it's the easiest to read. However, I'm not a fan of the 3 people on the right. I think this limits your demographics too much.
-
Mireya Pizarro commented:I love number 6 because its the one I remember it the most. I would make the entire you all one gray color so its easier to read. I can read it but it would be easier to read it. Great job and goes great with your purpose!
-
-
-
I liked the second one !
-
Husien Adel commented:hi i like No 7 :D it good but u need only a key to logo i mean a description words below it because the logo is not clear meaning & good work
-
-
2 is best, but try to reduce the number of colors.
-
Concept two is most effective for me.
There's a little too much going on (visually) in most of the others. You've got some clever ideas, but to incorporate too many into a single design works against the effectiveness.
As other commenters have mentioned, reducing the color palette is a good idea. The charcoal with one accent (either blue or green, but not both).
The quote bubble that you've incorporated into some of the other variations as the inner circle of the 'o' in 'you' could easily be incorporated into concept two (and omit the existing quote bubbles) to simplify it a bit yet still communicate the message of 'speaking up' or 'having a voice'.
Great typeface choice by the way.
Kudos - excited to see the finished product.
-
I think #7 works the best out of these. The more business looking guy fits in better than the bathroom door male sign.
The first one would work too, but just the words, not the people or the green box.
The guy could be a bit smaller so he fits within the rectangle of the logo, his feet are coming out down below the c.
There seems to be a lot of empty space on the top right of the logos happening when you stack the words.
-
Tiffany Gagnon commented:thanks for your comments. I'm having trouble with empty space on the top right. I'm just not sure how to solve that problem.
-
-
I would say number 3, but with the '2' in grey, as in number 7.
However if it was just out of these, I would say 7, as each element is clearly defined and as opposed to number 2, the image of the man adds personality.
However I must say that as a logo, to me it isnt very distinctive (as say the famous youtube logo, or the facebook). The name does also not describe the service clearly - however once i've read your explanation it makes sense, but at first glance it does not help me understand what it represents. This is not uncommon with logos, but in my opinion is majorly overlooked by businesses large and small.
-
Tiffany Gagnon commented:
Thanks for your comments, I'm really not a fan of the name but unfortunately it cannot be changed. I understand what youre saying though
-
