First let me mention how this is going to be a very difficult task to redesign concept feedback and please everyone at first. We use this site so much that our judgment is a little clouded because we are use to the current design.
What I like about the new design:
Overall I like where you are headed with this design but think there are a few things that could be improved:
I think I covered most of the things I wanted to say. Like I said, overall I like where you are headed with this and ultimately trust your judgment on where this ship (concept feedback) needs to go. A few last things that I hope you don't forget in the next iteration of CF:
I'm sure I'm forgetting a few things, let me know if you have any questions. Great work so far, look forward to seeing it in action!
These are really great ideas. (or should I say "OMG THIS IS GREEEAT!!!")
I'll just break this down page by page:
Main page - I honestly don't go here very often, I'm usually on the concept list page and just refresh :)
I think the removal of the current right column stating my current reputation, votes, profile and everything is a good idea - it gives you more room to work with and really isn't that needed.
It took me some time to understand, but reading Nates review I think I understand that there are some hover states on the concepts where it says "3 Reviews, 15 Votes, 200 Views, 5 Favorites". I think maybe a hybrid of the current site and the new design could work too - When you hover over the image for the review it slides up a small box which looks similar to the current site and gives those stats, while still displaying the image you're hovering over. Hope that makes sense... - Or replaces the posters name / company with the stat information while leaving their gravitar.
New concept page - I like the way it is now, but I understand wanting to pull out and make elite concepts more important than the rest. Right now the page just lists all of the new concepts in order of being posted. Either way would work, I generally just like to see a list of them as their posted and will look at and comment on anything I feel I can give some value to regardless of elite or regular.
Review page - One thing I like about the site now is that once I'm on the page to view a concept I'm also on the same page that I can type my review on. So I can see what others have said and see all of the images. It's an usability thing - I like that it's all in one page!
I think from these images that it would be broken down to a view page and a review page - Could there be some way to click "review" and have the right column on the 3rd image be replaced with the right column in the 4rd image, thus keeping me on the same page so I can bounce between the concept images and possibly others replies? It's helpful sometimes, so I don't say the exact same thing or can reference what someone else has said with ease. (You may have already had this planned, but couldn't get this from the images)
Some other usability good / bad things:
This box I am typing is is sort of thin, makes my posts really long and hard to read what I've typed because of the lack of space to see all of the text.
I like how the reviews are now wider, so when we get wordy people we don't scroll on forever to see everything they're said :)
Possibly the ability to preview my review, I never know if using # and 1 is causing a different color 1 to show up or using - and 1 is causing it to bold and list item something. Or just a "help" area on this input box - Maybe there is one that I've missed?
I agree with what Nate said, and tried not to overlap too much.
Eric - good stuff. The review comment you've made - about it being on a different page. You misread the mockups - it's on the same page. You click on the button to review and it dynamically shows the form for you to start reviewing in!
I sort of figured I did read it wrong, just didn't see the other reviews on the same image as the one we would type in so I thought it was possibly a different page. That's good, cause I like being on one page the entire time.
I like how you've brought "previous versions" right into the concept itself. I think you are linking to other posts. Not sure if this is the best way to do it just yet (or maybe I don't understand correctly). I just did a few versions for the grinparty site based on feedback. I didn't feel the revisions deserved their own postings, but it would be nice to be able to compare. maybe bring revisions right into the project itself? With maybe an icon to show that the project has been revised. That way a reviewer could go back and look at the revisions to see if the feedback was understood. ....but maybe it's only me who feels bad posting too many projects!
I think this site is most helpful for people who are in the middle of a project and are looking for feedback to make changes before the project is published or printed. Perhaps you could find a project or two that had a before feedback and after feedback to use in promoting the Premium Concepts. Show those marketers that good feedback really can make a project shine!
i love the direction of the new layout, esppecially the new way that the concepts will be shown.
i think the current design is great, but i think your definately going in the right direction with the changes.
I was wondering what would determine the "elite" status-I'm assuming that it would be from like concept votes but what else?
Something like average votes per concept and average votes per review. While we use the rating on the concept review to give a quick average to the user, we rely on the votes for the "quality" calculation. We'll handle concept revisions in a slightly different manner - a revision will not count against you.
Encourage you to implement everything. Then simply gather feedback as you go. Some aspects will work better than others, which is to be expected.
Altho' a relative newbie on CF, I'm a long time member/contributor at Marketing Profs. Much of what you've proposed mirrors the model of activities on that forum. And that's a good thing!
One minor drawback with having a marketplace in close proximity to a feedback forum is the tendency for some reviewers to promote their own capabilities under the guise of help and advice. For example: ...you could improve the whatnot by using the such-and-such found in my toolbox.
Another drawback I've noticed occurring on Marketing Profs, is the tendency for non-designers to solicit ideas for free. Real estate agents who want help with naming, logo ideas, tagline, website structure etc. but are too cheap to engage a professional go fishing for naive members to ripoff.
You'll have to be vigilant and rigorous with your admin skills.
Hope this helps.
Hey Aurimas,
I'm really happy about where CF is heading. Lots of things were improved since it was first released and it keeps getting better.
My two cents:
Overall it's a blast :D. I'm sooo excited! Great work guys!
Zeno@Graffino.
I forgot to mention that I've tried to leave out all the things the other reviewers said so I don't repeat them in my review. Nate has some very good points. ;)
Nothing to add, looking forward to see it marked up.
Thanks for the comments Nate, always a pleasure to get feedback from you guys. I
Here's the stuff I was going to post but didn't when I was posting the concept...check it out:
These are just some of the many features we have brewing in the pipes. Our goal is simple: improve the service, create value for people who want to spend money and get more exposure, and improve the tools which you can use for free and advance your craft.
Happy New Year to all of you from the team at CF!