Shane Kingery

AfricaHope NGO website redesign

By Shane Kingery

   on Nov 29, 2009
10 Reviews6 Votes0 Favorites600 Views
new

This concept is a new version of an older concept. View Old Version

Concept Reviews

  • Riady Santoso

    Riady Santoso

    Rank: 3 Superior

    453

    • Design: 4
    • Purpose: 4
    • Originality: 3
    • Engagement: 5
    0 Votes
    2,3 & 5

    Posted on Nov 29, 2009 at 12:39 AM

    My choices come to 2,3 & 5. 2 & 3 can be used interchangably, when the main image is dark, you can use transparent white area to put the text on to it. no 5, if you can use probably light blue or dark blue colur instead of yellow for the current page

  • Daina Reed

    Daina Reed

    Rank: 1 Elite

    CF Verified professional

    708

    • Design: 4
    • Purpose: 4
    • Originality: 3
    • Engagement: 3
    0 Votes
    put search icon in search field

    Posted on Nov 29, 2009 at 1:39 AM

    really great design!

    I love how big the main image is.

    the dropdown is lovely and it's very different from conservation.org so that's okay. it's not like you copy pasted it exactly! so every designer borrows in the way you have. no crime.

    3 is the best- go with that one!

    only thing that might be nice is to add either a "go" button after the search field some people may not know they can just press enter and it will work?! this is real minor as its hard to find something bad about this site!

    maybe you can think of something catchier to say than "welcome". me personally I never want to say "welcome". again this is sooo minor and just imparting on you my ideology of what a site should be :) and for the 3 opening paragraphs I'd make the first paragraph bigger bolder maybe a diff. color then switch to the small verdana.

    great work!

  • Swarat Ghosh

    Swarat Ghosh

    Rank: 2 Titan

    4866

    • Design: 4
    • Purpose: 4
    • Originality: 3
    • Engagement: 4
    0 Votes
    looking much better

    Posted on Nov 29, 2009 at 3:40 AM

    i feel your 6 thumbs was better placed then this in ur prev versions

  • Lizo Costi

    Lizo Costi

    Rank: 10 Newbie

    47

    • Design: 5
    • Purpose: 3
    • Originality: 4
    • Engagement: 4
    0 Votes
    Nice Design

    Posted on Nov 29, 2009 at 5:01 AM

    Very nice site, I love it all together and design and originality, 1 and 3 version I like very much.

  • Miro

    Miro

    Rank: 2 Titan

    3658

    • Design: 5
    • Purpose: 4
    • Originality: 3
    • Engagement: 4
    0 Votes
    well done

    Posted on Nov 29, 2009 at 6:44 AM

    Thank you, Shane!

    On the three first, I would change the colors of "TRUTH" and "HOPE", due to: to donate is to give hope, and the donate button is brown now, so the word "HOPE" should be brown too.

    You might add "home page" to the menu, it is always clearer when it is there.

    5) No you are not breaking any oath, they call that style "mega drop-down" here where there are also many other examples of it: http://www.smileycat.com/designelements/megadropdown_menus/

  • Robert Tipping

    Robert Tipping

    Rank: 4 Master

    1094

    • Design: 4
    • Purpose: 4
    • Originality: 4
    • Engagement: 3
    0 Votes
    Preffered bottom placement of badges/banners

    Posted on Nov 29, 2009 at 1:47 PM

    I like the transparent banner in 4 but preferred bottom placement of badges/banners as in original design. If indeed they are navigational then that would be the correct placement (as you have them now) however I would then question there size( to large IMO). Why is that an issue ? to many graphics can be a turn of if it takes to long to scan to main text.

    The structure as it is now say to me that those elements are the most Important - if that was your intention it was successful.

    • Shane Kingery
      Shane Kingery commented:
      Posted: on Nov 29, 2009 at 1:58 PM

      Thanks Robert. What is IMO?

      The links are navigational. You think they're too big? I'll think about that - possible alternatives...

    • Robert Tipping
      Robert Tipping commented:
      Posted: on Nov 29, 2009 at 2:12 PM

      IMO =In My Opinion (often wrong but with full heart)

      If you can -scale them down .

      If they are the most important leave them as they are .

      Architecture must have hierarchy or at least the intent - we feel less lost that way more cozy.

  • Newbird Design

    Newbird Design

    Rank: 2 Titan

    949

    • Design: 3
    • Purpose: 3
    • Originality: 3
    • Engagement: 3
    0 Votes
    cool

    Posted on Nov 29, 2009 at 7:39 PM

    i like this one if i were to change one thing it would be the 2 pixel dividers that you are using in the content area.

    by either getting rid of them or changing it to a one pixel line instead

  • Anderson Torres

    Anderson Torres

    Rank: 5 Advanced

    68

    • Design: 4
    • Purpose: 5
    • Originality: 4
    • Engagement: 4
    0 Votes
    Much better than the actual design

    Posted on Nov 29, 2009 at 8:13 PM

    I looked around the existing site and the proposed design is outstandingly better. clear, fresh, and up to date. Colors are awesome and the pictures are touching while showing happy kids. Some bottom links would be good,

    • Shane Kingery
      Shane Kingery commented:
      Posted: on Nov 29, 2009 at 8:16 PM

      thanks for the bottom link idea. After I moved the 6 ministry buttons to just below the header, the bottom seems lonely and white. Thanks for the idea.

  • Nate Hamilton

    Nate Hamilton

    Rank: 1 Elite

    CF Verified professional

    9919

    • Design: 3
    • Purpose: 4
    • Originality: 3
    • Engagement: 3
    0 Votes
    4th concept

    Posted on Nov 30, 2009 at 8:52 AM

    Great progress here, you should design more often :). I think the only thing I would change is adding some more padding and margins to the text area. Make it feel more spacious. It feels a bit tight right now. Great work!

  • Keli Marks

    Keli Marks

    Rank: 3 Superior

    440

    • Design: 3
    • Purpose: 4
    • Originality: 3
    • Engagement: 3
    0 Votes
    Font size.

    Posted on Dec 03, 2009 at 12:55 AM

    Still would work on your typographic contrast. I really prefer the nav bar of the previous version how ever i would ahve reduced the font size as well.

    I would use a serif font for this website, minion pro, georgia or something like that. The main content should be lowered to something more like 14-16. Adjust your line height if you switch to serif as it can be harder to read.

    Your banner is beautiful but not when crowed with oversized font. Keep the banner the center and by lowering your font sizes the site will become more balanced.