ZoomConcept Reviews
Positive Feature on cippo-alts2.jpg 1 Basic logo is very good New Idea on cippo-alts2.jpg 1 This is better than the colored box idea in the other image. But you should get rid of the "-" and perhaps use another and a bold(er) font. Try black as well instead of grey. Summary:
Nice logo, but without any textual addition not clear that what the company does. I don't like the colored text boxes below. I would also consider perhaps using another word than "design". What actually do you design?
-
Ciprian Stelian Tepes Bobescu commented:Hi Olav,
I've uploaded a new image (please check the last one)
Thanks for the updates
-
Ciprian Stelian Tepes Bobescu commented:
I design websites .. and also develop them. At the time when I've registered my domain name, I couldn't get any better than cippodesign.
Thanks again
-
Olav D commented:I really do like your logo :)
If I were you I would try a few other fonts for the "Design" text below. Perhaps a little tiny bit bigger as well. I'm not sure (I'd have to see first) but I think your initial idea of aligning the text below entirely with the logo was a good idea. So try some other fonts (both bold and regular), in different sizes, and both fully aligned with the logo as well as less wide than the logo and centered.
Is the background of the logo by the way plain grey? A circular, white radiant would come out very nice, or perhaps a light glow around your letters. Not sure if that's of any advice, but perhaps it'll help you too.
Good luck! Olav
-
Ciprian Stelian Tepes Bobescu commented:
Hi Olav
you might want to take a look at the last example and maybe you'd like to tell me what you think about that one. I have a feeling like it has a bit too much details.
Thanks
-
Olav D commented:
Looks good! But I would change the colors. Get rid of the orange, change the green. This green doesn't go well with the blue. The text below looks better; I would still try a few other fonts though.
-
Gopinath Chandrasekaran commented:test Account test Account test Account test Account test Account test Account test Account test Account test Account test Account test Account test Account
-
Vairamuthu Murugavel commented:test
-
Greg McMahan commented:I don't get it. What do you design? The last logo, with the grass underneath, suggests that you're a landscape designer?
I prefer the word "DESIGN" in logo 2. At first I actually did not see the word in the other logos, they are way too thin.
Why are you kerning the letters so closely?
-
Raylene Ewing commented:I was curious as to what you designed? is there a way for you to incorporate the word "web design" into your logo. it would make it much clearer to someone who knows nothing about your company.
-
Minor Problem Design Agency's Logo
Since you are a Design Agency, don't you think your logo should be more latest?C is not good when overlapped
C overlapping I is not good. PPO overlapping is good. If you can move C away, it might be perfect.Positive Feature Logo is Neat & Clean
This logo is very neat and clean and is direct. Professional look and feelSummary:
-
Ciprian Stelian Tepes Bobescu commented:
Hi Karnika, can you please tell me your opinion about the 1st logo (cippo-alts2-simple8.jpg) ?
Thanks, Ciprian
-
Serious Problem Too tight, too Bold, too close Serious Problem on cippo-alts2-simple4.jpg 1 Shadow is too much for a Logo. Serious Problem on cippo-alts2.jpg 1 Font for "Design" is overstyled. It takes away the coolness of the main Logo. The "-" signs are too much. I would try out a classic font like helvetica, maybe in spread setting Serious Problem on cippo-alts2-simple.jpg 1 No reason why there is a new elemet needed. Critical Problem this takes away the show form the main topic. I would not do that Positive Feature on cippo-alts2-simple4.jpg 1 Nice Fontsetting for "Design" Positive Feature on cippo-alts2.jpg 1 Good Visual Idea. Nicely Done. Summary:
-
Ciprian Stelian Tepes Bobescu commented:
Hi,
thanks a lot for your comment. I was working on another version meanwhile. Can you tell me your opinion about cippo-alts2-simple5.jpg ?
Thanks, Ciprian
-
Guntram Bechtold commented:I think this is the more "packed" version. right? Personally I think this version is very good aswell. My Favorites are: 1st version and 3rd version. The 3rd version is even more iconic.
In the original-logo i would aviod shadows at all, in production (e.g. on the website) i think thats okay.
Keep up the good work! best regards
Guntram
-
Summary:
Hi Ciprian,
In order of preference: - 1 (Really clean & looks professional - Expensive) - 5 (Very cluttered, but am drawn to it - loving the green underline) - 4 (Smart but too confusing on the eye, start to lose the clarity of the name) - 3 (Not a fan of this one, the spacing between or lack of is not good) - 2 (Some nice inner shadow effects, but there is far too much going on here)
Summary:
Each letter of "CIPPO" is overlapping the one to it's right, except for the letter "I". It feels a little inconsistent.
Also the smaller text below is so thin that it will be very hard to read at smaller sizes. Think of what this will look like on a shirt, and when people feature your logo in an article or something like that. That should be readable at smaller sizes.
I also would recommend changing the font your using .
-
Ciprian Stelian Tepes Bobescu commented:
Hi Daniel,
yes I know the 'I' is not overlapped. I didn't want to make it like that. As for smaller size, IF there is going to be a smaller size then the 'design' might go away.
Thanks
-
Positive Feature nothing
looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks FineSummary:
looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine looks Fine
Attached Files:
Minor Problem Not really a fan of the rounded Positive Feature This is by far the most readable "DESIGN" text. Positive Feature on cippo-alts2-simple.jpg 1 I like the color on this one. Kinda locks you into this color pallet for the rest of the site though. I also wonder how it would look on a dark background. Minor Problem I like the last logo with the green bottom but
The problem for me is that while it stands out and looks a bit "design worthy", I would question the combination of the font color being that dark blue and then mixing it with that orange and then green. It's too many colors playing for attention in varied places of the logo.Could you try a thinner/curvier CIPPO?
There's something about it that I feel can be bettered, can't put my finger on it but if you could try an option where CIPPO itself is slightly less heavy and possibly less straight? I don't want to offend you but this was the first thing that came to my mind when I saw your logo - I thought of "Hippo" more so because of the size of the font being a bit on the heavier side. I would want to associate your brand with design than anything else and just feel a less heavy font will help me associate it more positively.Critical Problem on cippo-alts2-simple8.jpg 1 You need to define what you do with a tagline here. Positive Feature Nicely done!
I love the simplicity of this logo and the implied motion. But it sounds like a technology company. Also, CIPPO may be pronounced as CHEAPO.Summary:
This is a very nice and simple design. I''d rather see it against a white background if you're planning to add it to a website. I think it will pop more against white.
-
Ciprian Stelian Tepes Bobescu commented:
Hi Charles, thanks a lot for the review.
Yes, might be pronounced like that. Although is quite hard to remember but I don't have a choice right now. It's funny the way you said it :) I will try to keep the costs as low as possible and provide high quality work.
For tagline... I'm not sure yet what do add there and how to style it.
Thanks for your input. Kind regards, Ciprian Tepes
-
Serious Problem About the i
About the first image you provide I think the italic makes it look odd to the eyes. I also think that font is not suitable for a nice looking logo. I realy like the fourth image. I like the letteres on top of each one... I just think the I should look to be bellow the C and above the first P ... but it looks like being at the same level of the O, this is, on the very bottom...Positive Feature I liked 4th from left
I liked 4th from leftNew Idea To much strokes i think on your logo, maybe you can play with size.thanks Positive Feature Last option, hands down.
As I was going through each thumbnail I was making notes in my head of what I would change. Then when I got to the last version (with the 3 blue green and purple boxes) you had fixed everything I didn't like.Last option - versatile
The last option is nice and versatile. If you think back to Marketing 101, one of the keys to establishing a great brand (or logo) is it needs to be extensible, meaning as your business grows, you can use the different color versions of the logo for different branches of your business.Minor Problem Just not a big fan of the CIPPO logo
I just think it could be better....Summary:
I like the concept but you have to work on the spacing between the letters It hink
Critical Problem On the first option with the italic font, I dont'think it is representative of good design. It looks fairly generic. The second option is cleaner as well as the design letters below. Third and fourth option seem too crowded. Summary:
Promising but the design word needs more work/thinking...
Summary:
I would keep your old website logo and change the color scheme to match your new website. Of the 5 you uploaded the 2nd & 3rd are best - the only one I would definitely not use is the last. The colors will pull attention away from your desired visitor actions
Critical Problem Logo Feedback
You're a design studio or agency? Your logo doesn't make it clear as to what CIPPO is. Also - I'm sitting here attempting to figure out what CIPPO stands for. Unless you have millions of dollars to invest in branding, I would change the name to something that reflects what it is that you do.Summary:
I like both the first and third concepts. I like the "CIPPO" in the first, but prefer the "DESIGN" in the third. The O also is too hidden in the third one.
Summary:
Nice concept. I would move the video higher on the homepage to make the site more captivating.
Other than that the message was clear and I easily understood the services offered.
cool logo.. simple but attractive