ZoomConcept Reviews
Minor Problem on Creative-Peers_LO_02b.jpg 1 This almost works very well. I can almost sense some human qualities in this graphic. But right now it looks like a "c" sitting on a very awkward chair. :} I would certainly explore this one some more. Positive Feature on Creative-Peers_LO_02b.jpg 1 This one is nice. I'm feeling the script lettering. Still needs some work. I suggest losing the gradient. 2 Too many light/shadows. Way to busy for a simple graphic. 3 Chunky and distracting from the actual name of the company. Font is... eh. I like what your doing with the light/heavy sans in the previous samples better. Positive Feature on creative_peers_LO_02a.jpg 1 This is just not attractive yet but has potential. Also this would make more sense if the name of the company was "Connecting" Peers. 2 These are "Microsoft" colors. Eh... you may want to stay clear of these. Graphic is also a bit generic. 3 I like this font. Is this "rounder?" I'd lose the dot but overall good look for the logo type. 4 Bubble outline not working 5 I sort of like this. Try taking out the folds and leave it smooth. And maybe use only two colors. Summary:
Hello Saadia,
I really enjoy it when someone puts up a good number of possibilities for a design. Kudos friend, for your hard work!
My main concern is that you are going too heavy with the gradients/shadows/highlights. (A lot of us are guilty for this including myself) While these effects can be cool, I personally feel they should be kept to a bare minimum. They give a "web only" vibe. As if to only be web specific. These effects can also transform your unique logo into a generic desktop icon real fast.
These three I enjoyed most: (in order)
- Most professional and original.
- This one has good potential as well.
- I like the "c" leaning on the "p" here but needs work.
Also the fonts you are using, although very modern/clean, are pretty typical these days, and also gives a "web specific" vibe. The word "creative" is used here, try playing around with some more creative typefaces.
-Ryan-
-
-
Ryan Bentin commented:Oh sorry about that. My comment was reformatted when I hit submit. Here is what it was meant to post:
The very first: Most professional and original.
right-bottom, first page: This one has good potential as well.
The very last, right-bottom, second page:I like the "c" leaning on the "p" here but needs work.
Try to number your samples better! lol ;)
As far as option-5, I am not sure what else you could do to it. It seems sound and finished. Although it is lovely, my concern is that it is merely aesthetic and does not speak about your client's services.
Option-8 on the first page has a human quality to it . What is a peer? A person right? So I think you should explore that some more. Maybe try to signify the creativity of this person.
-
Serina Patterson commented:Great Review, Ryan! :)
Summary:
Saadia Batool!
Your concept is very good, I like 07 and 08
-
Saadia Batool commented:
Thank You.
-
Minor Problem on Creative-Peers_LO_02b.jpg 1 May not look good as a black and white image. 2 If black and white or smaller, may lose depth of the image, which is a major part of the concept. Serious Problem Lost in translation
May not translate well to print,too complex.Critical Problem Popular brand?
Not sure how popular the brand will end up being, but these logos are relatively complex and may not translate well to small or simple versions, i.e. favicon, hats, business cards etc. If this isn't the focus and it's web only, then disregard.Positive Feature on Creative-Peers_LO_02b.jpg 1 I like the concept, could be translated to a very simplylogo if necessary. Positive Feature on creative_peers_LO_02a.jpg 1 Favorite option 2 This also has a lot of potential to be very simple or complex according to the situation, very versatile. Summary:
Overall I like the concept. I think you're onto something with the origami theme incorporated into the brand, leaves room for variation. My primary concern is that the more complex logos won't translate into black in white, smaller logos or other branding. If it's meant for web only then it could remain as complex as you want.
Minor Problem on creative_peers_LO_02a.jpg 1 This is quite cheesy; the worst of the bunch. Positive Feature on Creative-Peers_LO_02b.jpg 1 Love this one! Very modern and glossy! 2 This one is very good, looks modern yet professional. New Idea on creative_peers_LO_02a.jpg 1 I like this, don't like the colors on the graphic though. maybe green? Summary:
Hi Saadia,
I like the type of 08 and 07, because it draws my attention the most out of all the choices given.
I really like 09's tilted "Q" shape because it looks smart, smooth and active. I would maybe experiment with the colors used a bit with the "Q "for it looks unevenly distributed in a way. ( If you compare the color distribution used on the others you can see their more thought out.) Also, maybe experiment a bit more with it's size/placement to the type below giveing more choices to choose from.
Good luck with your logo!
Amy
Serious Problem on Creative-Peers_LO_02b.jpg 1 like the font and flow of name 2 definitely like this logo the best but the "p" looks a little awkward Serious Problem on creative_peers_LO_02a.jpg 1 this font with the logo design on version sitting at the bottom right; with logo modified to one or two colors 2 like this logo better with modification to one or two colors, with the lettering used in the top right Positive Feature on Creative-Peers_LO_02b.jpg 1 script font may make the logo appear dated Summary:
Great samples Saadia.
I like 7 and 8 the best; switching the between the 2 components and simplifying the color scheme.
Serious Problem on creative_peers_LO_02a.jpg 1 This looks a lot like MS Visual Studio logo. Positive Feature on Creative-Peers_LO_02b.jpg 1 I think this can be the better approach. This could be the startpoint to a good logo. Summary:
The name is a bit generic, maybe using a handwritten signature for logo is a good idea. The overall samples looks like a social marketing agency or something similar. Hope it helps!
Summary:
Tough one... I like the first items better than the last ones. My fav is the second in the upper right. Looks strong and smooth altogher!
Minor Problem on Creative-Peers_LO_02b.jpg 1 avoid 2 avoid 3 could become a workable logo Minor Problem on creative_peers_LO_02a.jpg 1 avoid 2 avoid 3 avoid Positive Feature on Creative-Peers_LO_02b.jpg 1 Best of all samples Positive Feature on creative_peers_LO_02a.jpg 1 Possibilities - only if it works in black and white Summary:
Saadia ~
Sample 05 is the only image that works. It has great potential:
Nest Steps in refinement process:
- General logo examples & more logo examples
- Logos from a master type designer
- Going the extra mile -- and work with the counter spaces between charcters
Hope this helps.
MichaelR
-
Saadia Batool commented:
My pleasure to hear from you , i am newbie & self learner , would love to learn from experts like you if you guide me little how i can improve my option 5.
-
Michael Rawlins commented:get out a pencil and a pad. go into sketch mode.
Positive Feature on creative_peers_LO_02a.jpg 1 The best of all. Lose the reflection and make the copy a bit bigger. -
Saadia Batool commented:
Thanks.
-
Positive Feature on Creative-Peers_LO_02b.jpg 1 This is the best logo for a Design Company, not complex but stylish, ready to be published Summary:
The first logo is ready, other 7 needs some work.
-
Saadia Batool commented:
Luca this is also my Fav .
-
Hi Ryan,
Thank you for the feedback. I will consider your points for my next revision .
I am little confuse with the numbers:
" These three I enjoyed most: (in order)
Most professional and original. = 5 ? This one has good potential as well. = 6? I like the "c" leaning on the "p" here but needs work = 7 ? "
Any idea from which i can drive the option-5 to something wow ?
Saadia